Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfPP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced additions. (CC) Tbhotch 03:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing a lot of reverting in the last couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 13:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:39, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Ip address is constantly adding picture in wrong sizes and destroys the composition of the page. In addition, information is given without source Mgfdhsrhe (talk) 13:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Ip vandalism changing boxoffice figure. Multiple reverts happened. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 15:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:48, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple disruptive attempts(failed) at redirecting the article. - Ratnahastin (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) partially blocked: 172.59.154.0/23 (talk · contribs) (from Oklahoma). --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE
    )
    19:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. - Ratnahastin (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE Daniel Case (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been the target of a Greek IP-hopper since at least 2 November. Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2a02:587:b00::/41 (talk · contribs). --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE
    )
    19:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:53, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One instance since last protection's expiry on the 11th. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Apart from today, one instance this year, so not really a long-term issue (surprisingly). Sdrqaz (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/AC target since 06:06, 8 February 2025. Alith Anar 17:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:22, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Protections are not for single IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Community sanctions enforcement. Eastern Europe antisemitism ctop RaschenTechner (talk) 18:27, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. While Eastern Europe is a Committee-endorsed contentious topic, there is no extended-confirmed restriction there (to my knowledge, anyways). Sdrqaz (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 69.54.57.43 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 23:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits here. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 18:46, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: Already pending changes, which seems to be working ok — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree; nothing since November. Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits at all in almost two months. And I don't think this one counts as a primary topic, nor has much relationship to the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 23:24, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs vandalizing this article for quite sometime now, adding texts like "Raza Bukhari has a Crush on Bajwa". -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. EndzoneEnthusiast 20:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most of the recent disruptors have been blocked; there's been just one that hasn't and they might not do it again (if they do, we can add this article to their partial block). Daniel Case (talk) 23:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Unhelpful removals by a specific IP range since November 2024.[1][2][3][4] The article was protected in November 2024 due to disruptive edits by IPs. Mann Mann (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS and GS/PW notices on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 23:35, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For a few months, until the Trump matter dies down. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 21:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Annh07 (talk) 21:20, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Vandalism of dynamic ip. Last for few days now. [[5]], [[6]], Theonewithreason (talk) 21:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. BlueboyLINY (talk) 21:54, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User who made the report is bold reverting without providing adequate explanations for their reverts, plus they have already been warned by an admin at the past at the article's talk page regarding their edit-warring behaviour. 2A02:85F:F0E5:AB20:3E19:60DB:C4AC:E7A (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:32, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Barack Obama a president has done controversial things including the Affordable Care Act, Allegations of Barack Obama spying on Donald Trump, etc. This may cause controversy and lead to warring or dispute. MersmanD (talk) 22:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:44, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:36, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Bit of an edit war going on between a multi-IP user and other editors. ZappaMatic 22:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) partially blocked: 50.104.0.0/19 (talk · contribs) (from Hailie Deegan). Those are BLP violations. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism from multiple IPs. Jfire (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Having a problem with BLP violation content being repeatedly added by an IP address over the past week or so. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 23:20, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: This page is a very easy SOCK detection page; specifically WP:LTA/A5. All mass blankings have been reverted within a minute, and protection does help keep the page stable, however, there is a very clear SOCK-behavior going on it since August 2024. Brief protections do not work. I'm honestly requesting unprotection to help catch more of this LTA's accounts. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:51, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    This is just one of many many honeypots for this LTA; I wouldn't have protected it otherwise. Also, you're supposed to ask the protecting admin before making a request here (which is highlighted in bright yellow on this page).-- Ponyobons mots 22:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    I would like to request if my son's page could be restored. I just learned that since his passing in 2018 that the page he created prior to is no longer found. I am his father and would like to update it and protect it for all time. Please let me know if you are able to assist or where I should look for such.

    Blessings, Ron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:a901:cb00:c477:fa1:4dc:3634 (talk) 02:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There's never been any article at that title on the English Wikipedia. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:36, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I think this could be read as Jhaysonn Pathak was a contributor here and created a page, title unknown, but there is no user account of that name either. I left a message on the IP talk page. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.