Jump to content

Talk:Eleftherios Venizelos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeEleftherios Venizelos was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 1, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
July 9, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up & sources

[edit]

It has been nearly 15 years since I wrote the page for Venizelos. During that period, there were good additions by many editors, but not necessarily being added in an ordered fashion. Moreover, it was reviewed for GA (a long time ago), with criticism being that the references needed some cleanup (missing information, consistency, in-text citation, reliability, etc.), among other things see details here, and many "citations needed" in the main text. I intend to revisit the article and try to clean up the references (I already did some work in this direction) and then update the text by minimizing the reliance on contemporary (potentially unreliable) to increase the use of more modern reliable sources. The are a few new books about Venizelos, so their inclusion would help here, see [1], [2]. Hopefully, this will bring the article to GA status. For reference, this is the version of the text before the cleanup.

A note for future, please adopt the template:sfn when you are adding a citation/reference.A.Cython (talk) 20:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]